The Great Fire of London

Famous Fires In History – The Great Fire of London

The Great Fire of London stands as a pivotal event in history, reshaping the landscape and identity of one of the world’s most iconic cities. Its cause, impact, and aftermath continue to fascinate and educate people centuries later.

The Cause

In September 1666, London was a bustling metropolis filled with wooden structures tightly packed together. The fire began in a bakery on Pudding Lane, where a spark ignited the dry timbers, rapidly engulfing the surrounding buildings.

The Spread

Fanned by strong winds and fueled by the city’s combustible architecture, the flames quickly spread, devouring everything in their path. Efforts to contain the fire were hampered by the lack of effective firefighting equipment and strategies.

The Destruction

The fire raged for four days, consuming over 13,000 houses, 87 churches, and landmarks like St. Paul’s Cathedral. Entire neighbourhoods were reduced to ash, leaving tens of thousands homeless and destitute.

The Impact

The Great Fire of London brought about significant changes in urban planning, architecture, and fire safety regulations. Christopher Wren seized the opportunity to redesign the city, laying the groundwork for the London we know today.

Reconstruction

In the fire’s aftermath, Londoners rallied together to rebuild their city. Stone and brick replaced wood as the primary building materials and wide streets were constructed to prevent future conflagrations.

Historical Significance

The Great Fire of London marked the end of the medieval city and the beginning of a modern metropolis. Its impact reverberated across Europe, influencing urban development and fire prevention measures for centuries to come.

Legacy

Today, the Great Fire of London is remembered as a testament to human resilience and the power of community. Its lessons continue to shape cities worldwide, reminding us of the importance of preparedness and innovation in safeguarding our urban centres.

Conclusion

The Great Fire of London remains a defining moment in the city’s history, symbolising both destruction and rebirth. From its humble origins in a bakery to its lasting impact on urban planning, this historic event continues to captivate and inspire generations.


Image Sources – Famous Fires In History – The Great Fire of London

The Great Fire of London – Image 1 – link  

second most common cause of fire

Nottingham firm believes it has the solution for Britain’s second most common cause of fire

The supplier of a ground-breaking fire suppression device could be poised to help extinguish the second most common cause of fire in the UK.

Nottingham-based company Aerocom (UK) Ltd has struck a five-year deal with pioneering Swedish company MAUS. This deal is to supply a unique fire suppression device called the Advanced Pro Stixx to the UK market. The devices are available in three sizes. The smallest of which is the size of a two-fingered Kit-Kat. It can automatically extinguish electric fires in seconds, including lithium-ion battery fires. These types of fires are becoming a growing concern with the increase in electric vehicles.

Fires ignited from an electrical distribution source were the second most common cause of fire in the UK. This was according to Government figures for the year ending March 2023, according to Government figures. Cooking appliances were the only source to cause more fires than electrical.

Aerocom (UK) Ltd believes that prior installation of the Advanced Pro Stixx device could have potentially prevented the recent spate of devastating lithium battery fires that engulfed three electric London buses last month. This bold claim could allow for many other similar incidents to be eliminated in the near future.

Where could this product be seen?

The inexpensive and super-lightweight device could potentially become a permanent fixture in homes, holiday homes, caravans, offices and infinite other applications across the UK. Aerocom (UK) Ltd says the Pro Stixx could save lives and millions of pounds in damages. These devices have the potential to slash insurance costs.

Tom Hughes, managing director of Aerocom (UK) Ltd, said: “This product is incredible. It is a genuine game-changer in terms of fire protection and suppression. There is nothing else like it available anywhere.”

The Pro Stixx can be installed in any enclosed electrical space in seconds. These include fuse boxes, electrical cabinets and the battery compartment of electric vehicles. They work by flooding the space with harmless potassium-based smoke when the temperature exceeds 170 degrees Celsius.

Typically, within five seconds, the heat source is fully extinguished. These devices can suppress fires before they have a chance to spread. They are especially crucial in terms of lithium-ion battery fires, which are notoriously difficult to put out and are prone to reignition.

What is being said?

Fire chiefs in the UK are especially worried about the increase in home fires brought on by batteries inside e-bikes and e-scooters. The London Fire Brigade has issued multiple safety warnings in response to the 150 recorded e-bike fires and 28 recorded e-scooter fires in London alone last year. The number of these fires has risen 60% over the previous year.

The launch announcement by Aerocom (UK) Ltd follows three instances in January where buses operated by Go Ahead London caught fire and became quickly engulfed in flames. These events put lives at risk and heaped pressure on London Mayor Sadiq Khan to address the problem.

Mr Hughes said that, since his firm won the UK contract with MAUS to supply the devices, he had been inundated with enquiries from organisations and individuals clamouring to place orders. Many more MAUS fire suppression products for other applications are available. It is inevitable that, through Aerocom (UK) Ltd, this product range will be developed and expanded.

Aerocom (UK) Ltd is an established leading supplier of pneumatic tube systems to manufacturing, logistics and healthcare facilities. They are an approved supplier of the NHS, which has already expressed an interest in Pro Stixx.

Another key source of interest has come from the holiday lets and the camping and caravanning sector. For them, this device is seen as a major innovation in fire protection.

“The technology is tried, tested, and proven,” said Mr Hughes. “It is also utterly simple to install and inexpensive – not least when you balance it with the cost of fire-related loss or damage and potentially losing a life.”

The MAUS Advanced Pro Stixx has been granted a CE mark for fire safety. It was assessed to meet the European high safety, health, and environmental protection requirements.

Windsor Castle Fire

Famous Fires In History – 1992 Windsor Castle Fire

November 20, 1992, the iconic Windsor Castle, one of the most revered symbols of British heritage and monarchy, was engulfed in flames. The fire raged for over 15 hours and caused extensive damage to the historic structure. This left the country and the world in shock and disbelief. The 1992 Windsor Castle fire stands as one of the most significant incidents in recent British history. It prompted widespread concern over the preservation of cultural landmarks. It sparked debates about fire safety measures and many more health and safety concerns.

The Historic Windsor Castle

Before delving into the details of the fire, it’s essential to understand the significance of Windsor Castle. Situated in Berkshire, England, Windsor Castle is the oldest and largest inhabited castle in the world. It served as one of the principal residences of the British monarch. With its rich history spanning over a millennium, the castle has been witness to countless royal events, ceremonies, and state functions. This made it a symbol of continuity and tradition within the monarchy.

The Cause of the Fire

The fire was ignited by a spotlight used to illuminate a curtain in the private chapel within the castle’s Upper Ward. The spotlight, which had been in use for an extended period, overheated and set fire to the curtain. This then quickly spread to the surrounding wooden structure. The dry and aged timber within the chapel provided ample fuel for the flames. This allowed the fire to intensify and spread throughout the building at a rapid rate.

Sequence of Events

The fire began in the late afternoon of November 20, 1992. Despite efforts to contain the blaze, it quickly grew out of control. Within no time it engulfed the chapel and spread to adjacent areas of the castle. The intense heat and rapid spread of the fire posed significant challenges to firefighters.

Hundreds of firefighters, volunteers, and military personnel were quickly rushed to the scene of the fire. Their heroic efforts focused on evacuating the castle’s occupants and salvaging priceless artefacts. They played a key role in preventing the fire from engulfing the entire structure. Despite their valiant attempts, the fire caused extensive damage to several parts of the castle. This included the State Apartments, St. George’s Hall, and the Grand Reception Room.

Response and Recovery Efforts

After the incident, the castle needed to be restored and it would prove to be an extensive task. Queen Elizabeth II, deeply saddened by the destruction of her beloved residence, pledged her full support to the restoration efforts. She expressed her deep gratitude to the firefighters and emergency responders who had risked their lives to save the castle.

A team of architects, historians, and craftsmen was assembled for the restoration project. This project would span several years and cost millions of pounds. The restoration efforts aimed not only to repair the physical damage caused by the fire but also to implement modern fire prevention and safety measures to protect the castle from future disasters.

Legacy and Impact

The 1992 Windsor Castle fire left an indelible mark on British history and served as a wake-up call regarding the importance of preserving and protecting cultural landmarks. The incident prompted a renewed focus on fire safety measures for historic buildings, leading to stricter regulations and guidelines to prevent similar tragedies from occurring in the future.

The restoration of Windsor Castle stands as a testament to the resilience and determination of the British people to preserve their cultural heritage. Today, Windsor Castle continues to serve as a symbol of national pride and remains a popular tourist attraction, welcoming visitors from around the world to marvel at its historic splendour.

Conclusion

The 1992 Windsor Castle fire remains etched in the collective memory of the British people as a stark reminder of the fragility of our cultural heritage. While the fire caused significant damage and destruction, it also renewed a commitment to protecting and preserving historic landmarks for future generations. Through careful restoration and ongoing maintenance, Windsor Castle stands as a testament to the enduring spirit of resilience and determination in the face of adversity.

Image Sources – Famous Fires In History – 1992 Windsor Castle Fire

The 1992 Windsor Castle Fire “Absolutely Devastated” Queen Elizabeth – Image 1 – link

Crystal Palace Fire 1936

Famous Fires In History – 1936 Crystal Palace Fire

On the night of November 30, 1936, one of London’s most iconic landmarks, the Crystal Palace, was engulfed in flames. This devastating event marked the end of an era for a structure that had come to symbolise Britain’s industrial and cultural prowess. The fire, with its intense blaze and destructive aftermath, left an indelible mark on history, serving as a poignant reminder of both the fragility of human achievement and the resilience of the human spirit.

The Rise of the Crystal Palace

The Crystal Palace was originally built in Hyde Park for the Great Exhibition of 1851, a spectacular showcase of industrial and artistic achievements from around the world. Designed by Sir Joseph Paxton, the Crystal Palace was a marvel of engineering, constructed almost entirely of glass and iron. Its groundbreaking design and sheer scale captivated millions of visitors during the exhibition, earning it the nickname “The Eighth Wonder of the World.”

After the Great Exhibition concluded, the Crystal Palace was dismantled and relocated to Sydenham Hill in south London. It was here that the palace would become a permanent fixture on the London skyline and a hub for cultural, artistic, and scientific pursuits. Over the decades, it hosted a myriad of exhibitions, concerts, and events, solidifying its status as a beloved institution in the hearts of Londoners and visitors alike.

The Tragic Fire

The fire that engulfed the Crystal Palace on that fateful November night in 1936 is believed to have started in the women’s cloakroom. Fueled by the building’s vast expanses of timber flooring and dry wooden fixtures, the flames quickly spread, consuming everything in their path. Efforts to contain the fire were hampered by the palace’s intricate layout and the lack of modern firefighting equipment.

As the blaze raged on, crowds gathered to witness the spectacle, their hearts heavy with sorrow as they watched a symbol of national pride reduced to smouldering ruins. Despite the heroic efforts of firefighters, little could be done to save the historic structure. By the following morning, the once magnificent Crystal Palace lay in ruins, its towering glass domes shattered and its ornate facades reduced to charred rubble.

The Aftermath

In the wake of the fire, Londoners mourned the loss of the Crystal Palace, lamenting the destruction of a cherished landmark that had stood for over eight decades. Efforts to rebuild the palace were considered but ultimately deemed impractical and too costly given the economic hardships of the time.

In the years that followed, the site of the Crystal Palace became a public park, serving as a tranquil retreat for Londoners seeking solace amidst the chaos of urban life. While the physical structure may have been lost to the ravages of fire, the spirit of the Crystal Palace lived on in the memories of those who had walked its hallowed halls and marvelled at its grandeur.

Legacy

The legacy of the Crystal Palace endures to this day, serving as a reminder of the fleeting nature of human achievement and the importance of preserving our cultural heritage for future generations. While the physical remnants of the palace may have been lost, its legacy lives on in the hearts and minds of all those who have been touched by its beauty and grandeur.

Conclusion

The 1936 Crystal Palace fire remains a tragic chapter in London’s history, a poignant reminder of the fragility of human endeavour and the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity. Though the flames may have consumed the physical structure, the legacy of the Crystal Palace lives on, a testament to the enduring power of art, innovation, and the human imagination.


Image Sources – Famous Fires In History – 1936 Crystal Palace Fire

Image 1 – The Crystal Palace Fire – link

Grenfell Tower Fire

Famous Fires In History – 2017 Grenfell Tower Fire

The Grenfell Tower fire, a catastrophic event that unfolded on June 14, 2017, in West London, shocked the world and exposed critical shortcomings in fire safety practices. This devastating incident claimed 72 lives, injured many, and left a lasting impact on the affected community. As we delve into the details of the Grenfell Tower fire, it becomes evident that several actions were overlooked in fire safety terms during the building’s construction, exacerbating the severity of the tragedy.

Construction and Cladding

The Grenfell Tower, a 24-story residential building, underwent a major refurbishment between 2012 and 2016. One of the pivotal decisions made during this renovation was the installation of external cladding. The material chosen, aluminium composite material (ACM) with a polyethene core, had concerning fire safety implications.

The use of combustible cladding posed a grave risk, as it allowed the fire to spread rapidly and uncontrollably throughout the exterior of the building. The materials used in the cladding were not fire-resistant, violating fundamental fire safety principles. This oversight significantly contributed to the unprecedented scale of the Grenfell Tower fire.

Compromised Compartmentation

Compartmentation is a fundamental aspect of building design to contain fires within specific areas, preventing their rapid spread. However, the Grenfell Tower needed more effective compartmentation due to various factors, including the flawed cladding system and inadequate fire-stopping measures.

Firestopping, which involves sealing gaps and openings in the building’s structure to prevent fire from spreading, was insufficient in Grenfell Tower. Gaps left around pipes and conduits allowed flames to travel through the building unchecked, breaching the intended fire barriers. This failure in compartmentation further accelerated the fire.

Inadequate Fire Safety Measures

The Grenfell Tower fire also shed light on the inadequacy of fire safety measures within the building. The absence of a sprinkler system and the reliance on a single stairwell as the primary means of escape significantly compromised the evacuation process. The fire safety systems were not robust enough to cope with a blaze of such magnitude.

Regulatory Failures

Beyond the immediate construction and safety issues, the Grenfell Tower tragedy exposed regulatory failures and shortcomings in oversight. The cladding material used needed to comply with fire safety regulations, yet it was installed without adequate scrutiny. The regulatory framework failed to implement proper fire safety measures, putting lives at risk.

Grenfell Tower Fire

Conclusion and What Has This Event Taught Us

The Grenfell Tower fire is a stark reminder of the consequences of overlooking fire safety in building design and construction. The fatal combination of combustible cladding, compromised compartmentation, inadequate safety measures, and regulatory failures created a perfect storm, leading to an unprecedented loss of life.

The aftermath of this tragedy prompted significant changes in building design and regulations worldwide. Key responses include stricter regulations on combustible cladding, enhanced fire safety assessments for existing buildings, revisions to building codes, increased tenant involvement in safety decisions, greater professional accountability, independent oversight mechanisms, and improved education and training for industry professionals. These measures aim to prevent similar tragedies and prioritise safety in construction practices. The lessons learned from Grenfell Tower must catalyse change, ensuring that such a devastating incident is never repeated.

Image Sources for Famous Fires In History – 2017 Grenfell Tower Fire

Image 1 – London fire: Grenfell Tower ‘renovated with deadly cladding’ – link

Image 2 – Grenfell council had £129m it could have spent on tower renovation – link

2012 Spanish Grand Prix

Famous Fires in Sport – Williams Garage 2012 Spanish Grand Prix

The 2012 Spanish Grand Prix is a race that will never be forgotten, not only for the thrilling race on the Circuit de Catalunya but also for the unexpected and dramatic turn of events that followed. Pastor Maldonado’s surprising win for the Williams team was overshadowed by a fire that erupted in the team’s garage post-race, leaving the paddock in chaos and sparking a controversy that would linger for years to come.

The Spanish Grand Prix

The race was a spectacle, with the typical strategic battles and wheel-to-wheel action on the track. However, the Venezuelan driver, Pastor Maldonado, stole the show by securing his first-ever Formula 1 victory. The win marked a historic moment for Maldonado and the Williams team, breaking a long-standing drought since their last triumph.

2012 Spanish Grand Prix

The Garage Fire

About 90 minutes after the race, the Williams garage caught fire. Pit crews from the Williams, Force India and Caterham teams were able to bring the blaze under control. Thirty-one people were injured, with seven transferred to local hospitals. All were later released. 

Teams were reported as lending replacement equipment to Williams for the Monaco Grand Prix. Maldonado rescued his twelve-year-old cousin Manuel from the fire, as he had a broken foot. The sight of flames engulfing the garage sent shockwaves through the paddock. This raised questions about the safety protocols in place, and the team modified its fuel handling safety procedures for the next race accordingly. This cast a shadow over the miraculous victory.

Investigations and Findings

In the aftermath of the incident, Formula 1 authorities launched an investigation into the garage fire. The focus was on determining the cause of the blaze and whether any foul play was involved. Early reports suggested that the fire was caused by fuel that exploded while being prepared for a routine post-race inspection. 

Photographs taken at the scene showed Senna’s car as the source of the fire, which started when a fuel rig used to drain the car began leaking. Other reports suggested that a spark from the KERS unit initiated the blaze. Senna’s FW34 car was damaged as a result; Maldonado’s car was not in the garage at the time. This led to heightened scrutiny of safety measures within the sport.

Conspiracy Theories

Amazing achievements that defy simple explanations give rise to conspiracy rumours. Maldonado’s victory in the Spanish Grand Prix is a prime example of this.

The reason for the surprise was not the team’s victory after a protracted losing streak or their poor performance over many seasons but, because it was precisely in commemoration of the seventieth anniversary of Sir Frank Williams, founder and owner of the team and great friend of the Formula One boss, Bernie Ecclestone.

To put an end to anyone who might be doubting the existence of fortunate coincidences, a fire broke out in Williams’ garage at The Circuit of Catalunya shortly after the race.

“Anyone who believes that the Williams car all of a sudden, can win a Grand Prix without anything wrong is acting, he must also believe in Santa Claus. I doubt they can repeat the feat in the remaining 13 championship races. At the maximum, they will make some points characteristic of teams vying for midfield …”

“This is proof of how Ecclestone enriched with the bookmakers in England, he controls the outcome of this circus … He wanted to please his old friend honouring him with a victory of his bankrupted team … Must have sent Pirelli a message to deliver “special tyres” for Williams put on Maldonado’s car, or have advised the team to use some technical advantage outside the regulations as increase the 18,000 rpm allowed, and after sent their own mechanics to burn the garage to erase the traces or evidence of the wrongdoing … “

People made links between the fire and the miraculous win saying that the fire was to cover up and destroy any evidence that led to them winning the race. These claims are very extraordinary with many people getting injured in the fire. If anything like that were to have happened it would of been very inhumane. But in the world of social media, these conspiracies spread and are still talked about to this day.

Conclusion

The 2012 Spanish Grand Prix will forever be remembered not only for Maldonado’s surprising win but also for the controversies and chaos that ensued. While the conspiracy theories surrounding the victory may have added an extra layer of drama to the race, the garage fire highlighted the importance of stringent safety measures within the high-stakes world of Formula 1. The incident sparked conversations about the need for improved safety protocols. Ensuring that such events remain a rare occurrence in the future of the sport. As conspiracies still loom large over this race and Maldonado’s win, it will always be remembered and will forever go down in Formula 1 history.

Image Sources for Famous Fires in Sport – Williams Garage 2012 Spanish Grand Prix

Maldonado I Feared – Image 1 – link

Where is Maldonado Now – Image 2 – link

1994 German Grand Prix

Famous Fires in Sport – Jos Verstappen 1994 German Grand Prix

The world of Formula 1 has witnessed its fair share of dramatic moments throughout its rich history. One such incident that left an incredible mark on the sport occurred during the 1994 German Grand Prix. The race at Hockenheimring not only showcased the speed and skill of the drivers but also highlighted the inherent dangers of motor racing. This accident showed the world of motorsport the dangers behind refuelling and what could happen if something went wrong.

Background Behind the 1994 German Grand Prix

The 1994 Formula 1 season was plagued by tragedy, with the death of Ayrton Senna and Roland Ratzenberger at Imola earlier in the year. Safety concerns were at the forefront of everyone’s minds, prompting a closer look at the sport’s regulations and the design of the cars. The 1994 German Grand Prix was to take place on July 31st 1994. This German Grand Prix would then go on to remind the world that danger still loomed on the track.

The Incident

Jos Verstappen, (father of current Formula 1 driver Max Verstappen) was behind the wheel of the Benetton-Ford when the incident occurred. During a routine pit stop on lap 18, the fuel nozzle malfunctioned, causing a spray of highly flammable fuel onto the car. In a matter of seconds, Verstappen’s car became engulfed in flames. This was due to the heat of the car igniting the spilled fuel.

Chaos ensued as the Benetton crew and nearby marshals rushed to extinguish the fire. The severity of the situation was evident, and the fear for Verstappen’s safety gripped both the pit crew and spectators alike. Miraculously, Verstappen managed to escape the inferno, suffering only minor burns on his nose and right foot.

When interviewed about the incident Jos Verstappen said this –

“I remember coming in for what I thought was a regular pitstop. Sitting in the car, I would always open my visor because when I stood still I would sweat a lot, so as I came to a halt I opened my helmet to get some fresh air.”

“Then I saw the fluid coming. This was before I could smell anything, and that is why I was waving my arm. Then everything went up [in flames] and it was suddenly dark and black, and I couldn’t breathe. It was a situation you don’t normally think about: it is like you are suddenly put in a dark room, and then you think, ‘I need to get out..’”

“It was a struggle to get the steering wheel off, and that took me a couple of seconds. Then I had to release the belts. So there were a lot of things I had to do before I stood up and realised what had happened.”

Immediate Aftermath

The fire was put out within a matter of seconds, but there remained frantic scenes inside the Benetton garage as the team tried to get to grips with what had happened.

The Benetton crew even had to start getting ready for Schumacher’s second stop, before his retirement meant the focus could shift to treating the burns of those caught up in the fire.

Impact of the Event on Formula 1

The incident raised serious questions about the safety procedures in place during pit stops. Investigations revealed that a valve in the refuelling rig had failed, leading to the uncontrolled release of fuel. As a result, changes were implemented to improve the safety of pit stops, including modifications to the refuelling equipment and stricter regulations regarding fuel handling.

The Jos Verstappen fire incident at the 1994 German Grand Prix served as a stark reminder of the dangers inherent in motor racing. While strides have been made to enhance safety in the sport, this incident underscored the need for constant vigilance and improvements in technology and regulations. 

In 2010, 16 years later, refueling was banned from Formula 1. This meant that cars would have to carry all the fuel for the whole race from the start. This came with safety concerns for the drivers. This rule could not be implemented before the 2010 season with the cars being too small to hold that much fuel. But along with the regulation changes in 2010 this allowed for the removal of refueling.

Conclusion

The 1994 German Grand Prix will forever be etched in Formula 1 history not just for the intense on-track battles but also for the terrifying incident involving Jos Verstappen. The resilience of both Verstappen and the sport as a whole was on display that day, prompting a renewed commitment to safety that continues to shape Formula 1 to this day.

Image Sources for Famous Fires in Sport – Jos Verstappen 1994 German Grand Prix

Photo 1 – Benetton Pit Fire (Germany 1994) – link

Photo 2 – From The Archives – link

Famous Fires in Sport - Grosjean 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix

Famous Fires in Sport – Grosjean 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix

The Bahrain Grand Prix in 2020 will forever be etched in Formula 1 history for a harrowing incident that unfolded on the first lap. The Haas F1 Team driver Romain Grosjean experienced a horrific crash that sent shockwaves through the motorsport community. This crash was seen on major news and most people knew about the incident at the time, even if they were not into motorsports.

This crash was part of the Netflix Formula 1 documentary ‘Drive to Survive’ and was the key aspect of the Season 3 Episode 9 ‘Man On Fire’. The Netflix documentary brought a lot of viewers to the sport, and this documentary gave a great insight into the behind-the-scenes of Formula 1 that the viewer could not see before. This episode gives a great look into the crash and what happened that weekend.

The 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix

The race took place at the Bahrain International Circuit on November 29, 2020. As the lights went out for the start, chaos ensued. Romain Grosjean, starting from 19th on the grid, found himself involved in a dramatic incident just a few corners after the race began.

The Crash

Grosjean’s Haas car collided with AlphaTauri’s Daniil Kvyat, sending him off the track and into the barriers at a high speed. The impact was so severe that the car split into two, with the front section penetrating the barrier, and erupting into flames. This sort of crash is very uncommon, that is what made it so terrifying.

The most remarkable aspect of this incident was Grosjean’s miraculous escape. After freeing himself from the constraints inside the cockpit, he hoisted himself out of the fire and climbed over the safety barrier. The prompt response of the track marshals and the effectiveness of the safety features in place played a vital role in preventing a more tragic outcome. The marshalls did an excellent job rushing to help Grosjean out of the flaming cockpit as well as extinguishing the fire with fire extinguishers as soon as possible.

A full investigation by the FIA (Fédération Internationale de l’Automobile) was taken out of the cause of the fireball that was caused in the crash. Their statement read – 

“The car suffered extensive damage during the impact including separation of the power train assembly from the survival cell. The fuel tank inspection hatch on the left-hand side of the chassis was dislodged and the engine fuel supply connection was torn from the fuel tank ‘safety bladder’; both providing primary paths for the escape of fuel from the tank.”

“The high voltage Energy Recovery System (ERS) battery was significantly damaged, with some parts of the ERS battery assembly remaining with the powertrain and others remaining attached to the survival cell. The fire was ignited during the final moments of the barrier impact, starting from the rear of the survival cell and progressing forwards towards the driver as the fire grew.”

Grosjean 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix

Safety Measures

Formula 1 has continuously evolved its safety standards, and Grosjean’s crash highlighted the effectiveness of these measures. The ‘Halo Device’, a safety innovation introduced in 2018, played a crucial role in protecting Grosjean’s head from the barriers during the impact. When the ‘Halo Device’ was introduced into Formula 1 back in 2018, many drivers and people around Formula 1 said they were not a fan and it ruined the look of the car. This device since its introduction has gone on to save countless lives and prevent many bad injuries.

The fire-resistant Nomex racing suit that the drivers are made to wear gave Grosjean the crucial seconds he needed for him to escape the flames.

Medical Intervention

Following his escape, Grosjean was immediately taken to the medical centre for examination. He suffered burns to his hands and a sprained ankle but was otherwise remarkably unharmed, a testament to the advancements in safety technology and the meticulous planning of the FIA.

pasted image 0

Investigation and Changes after the 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix

The FIA launched a thorough investigation into the crash, analysing data from the car and the circuit. Changes were subsequently made to the barrier design and other safety protocols to further enhance driver protection in similar incidents.

Conclusion

Romain Grosjean’s crash at the Bahrain Grand Prix in 2020 was a terrifying moment that showcased the resilience of both the driver and the safety measures in Formula 1. The incident prompted a reassessment of safety protocols, leading to improvements that continue to shape the future of the sport. As we reflect on this remarkable event, it serves as a stark reminder of the risks inherent in motorsport and the relentless pursuit of safety to minimise those risks.

Image Sources for Famous Fires in Sport – Grosjean 2020 Bahrain Grand Prix

Man on Fire – Image 1 – Motosport.com – link

Crash Diagram – Image 2 – Crashalog – Grosjean 3D Crash Animation – F1 Bahrain 2020

Hands – Image 3 – Formula 1 – link

Famous Fires in Sport - Bradford City Stadium Fire

Famous Fires in Sport – Bradford City Stadium Fire

The Bradford City Stadium Fire was a tragic accident like no other. The fire occurred during a Football League Third Division match on Saturday, 11 May 1985 at the Valley Parade stadium in Bradford, West Yorkshire, England. The event led to the death of 56 spectators and injured at least 265. The Bradford City Stadium fire event changed the way that stadiums were built. This event paved the way for drastic new regulations regarding fire safety in these types of structures.

The Bradford City Stadium was renowned for its old-fashioned layout and features, which included the main stand’s wooden roof. Prior alerts had previously been issued over a significant accumulation of rubbish in the space beneath the stand’s seats. After the season, a steel structure was supposed to take its place, as the stand had been declared officially condemned.

The match between Bradford City and Lincoln City was the final game of the season. It had started in a celebratory atmosphere with the home team receiving the Third Division championship trophy.

The match kicked off at 3:04 pm and after 40 minutes of the first half, the score remained 0–0. The match was described to be a drab affair with neither team threatening to score.

At 3:44 pm, five minutes before half-time, the first sign of fire was noticed three rows from the back of block G. A glowing light could be seen, as reported by television commentator John Helm. 

In less than four minutes, with the windy conditions, the fire had engulfed the whole stand, trapping some people in their seats. In the panic that ensued, fleeing crowds escaped onto the pitch but others at the back of the stand tried to break down locked exit doors to escape. 

The fire escalated very rapidly, and flames became visible; police started to evacuate the stand. As the blaze spread, the wooden stands and roof covered with layers of highly flammable bituminous roofing quickly went ablaze. Burning timbers and molten materials fell from the roof onto the crowd and seating below, and dense black smoke enveloped a passageway behind the stand, where many spectators were trying to escape.

One eyewitness, Geoffrey Mitchell, told the BBC: “It spread like a flash. I’ve never seen anything like it. The smoke was choking. You could hardly breathe.” As spectators began to cascade over the wall separating the stand from the pitch, the linesman on that side of the pitch informed referee Norman Glover, who stopped the game with three minutes remaining before half-time. It took less than four minutes for the entire stand to be engulfed in flames.

There were no fire extinguishers in the stand’s passageway for fear of vandalism. One spectator ran to the clubhouse to find one but was overcome by smoke and impeded by others trying to escape, and could not return. Supporters either ran upwards to the back of the stand or downwards to the pitch to escape. The stand had no perimeter fencing to keep fans from accessing the pitch, thus averting an instance of crush asphyxia. Footage of the accident at this point shows levels of confusion among the spectators. While many were trying to escape or to cross the pitch to the relative safety of the neighbouring stands, other spectators were observed cheering or waving to the broadcasting pitchside cameras.

Most of the exits at the back were locked or shut and there were no stewards present to open them, but seven were forced open or found open. Three men smashed down one door and at least one exit was opened by people outside, which again helped prevent further deaths. Geoffrey Mitchell said: “There was panic as fans stampeded to an exit which was padlocked. Two or three burly men put their weight against it and smashed the gate open. Otherwise, I would not have been able to get out.” At the front of the stand, men threw children over the wall to help them escape. Most of those who escaped onto the pitch were saved.

People who had escaped the fire then tried to assist their fellow supporters. Police officers also assisted in the rescue attempts. One man clambered over burning seats to help a fan, as did player John Hawley, and one officer led fans to an exit, only to find it shut and had to turn around.

Bradford City’s coach Terry Yorath, whose family was in the stand, ran onto the pitch to help evacuate people. Another player went into the office space to ensure there was nobody there. One fan put his jumper over a fellow supporter’s head to extinguish flames. Those who escaped were taken out of the ground to neighbouring homes and a pub, where a television screened World of Sport, which broadcast video recorded of the fire just an hour after it was filmed. There were many cases of heroism, with more than 50 people later receiving police awards or commendations for bravery.

The fire brigade arrived at the ground four minutes after they were initially alerted. However, the fire had consumed the stand entirely by that point. The fire brigade was already faced with huge flames and very dense smoke on arrival. As many supporters still required rescue from the stand, they were unable to immediately start fighting the source of the fire.

The fire destroyed the main stand completely and left only burned seats, lamps and metal fences remaining. Within a few hours of the blaze starting, it was established that 56 people had been killed, many as a result of smoke inhalation, although some of them had survived until reaching the hospital.

What did the Bradford City Stadium Fire Change?

The Bradford City Stadium Fire led to rigid new safety standards in UK stadiums. This included the banning of new wooden grandstands. It was also a catalyst for the substantial redevelopment and the modernisation of many British football grounds. This changed many grounds across the country within the following thirty years. Bradford City continues to support the Bradford Burns Unit, at the University of Bradford, as its official charity.

lithium-ion battery fires

Former firefighter reveals terrifying truths of lithium-ion battery fires

A former firefighter has raised serious concerns about how emergency crews deal with lithium-ion battery fires.

This came out in an interview with the firefighter after an electric bus set alight in Wimbledon on Thursday, Neil Pederson has warned of a tsunami of similar fires in the future.

Enormous amounts of water are needed and this type of lithium-ion battery fires are currently difficult to put out quickly.

He set up Fire Containers Ltd in 2019 which is looking to develop the world’s first Electric Vehicle Containment Unit.

How are lithium-ion battery fires put out?

Neil told Metro: ‘There could be a tsunami of electric vehicle fires if action is not taken soon.’

‘This is because they are basically chemical fires that spread from cell to cell and create a domino effect where water is useless against a blaze.’

‘Firefighters have to use 10 to 15 times more water to tackle an EV fire over a petrol or diesel vehicle because of hazardous flammable toxic gases it gives off from the lithium batteries.’

‘Water is useless against these toxic gases and turns to steam.’

‘What’s more, lithium batteries are on the bottom of electric vehicles and are hard for firefighters to tackle so this is where the EVCU comes in handy.’

The only fire services in the UK that use the EVCUs are Staffordshire and West Midlands.

With 20 million electric vehicles expected on the UK’s roads by 2032, up from 1.2 million in 2023, this poses a problem for fire services up and down the country.

The sale of electric vehicles outstripped diesel and petrol car sales last year, which Neil says will equate to more fires on the UK’s roads.

What could have caused the electric London bus fire?

Addressing Thursday’s fire in London, Neil said: ‘It’s most likely that today’s electric vehicle bus fire in London was caused by an electrical fault and may not be linked to the lithium-ion batteries if the fire started at the back of the bus.

‘This is because lithium batteries on electric buses are on the top of the front of the bus rather than the back.’

‘But as the sale of electric vehicles continues to increase, fires like these are only going to become more common.’

‘On average it takes firefighters four hours to extinguish EV fires and this is because of their lithium batteries and on average costs £1million an hour each time traffic is held up because of a burning vehicle.’

Have electric bus fires happened before?

The Wimbledon bus fire is not the first time an EV fire has caused chaos in London after a Potters Bar bus depot fire in 2019.

And there are safety concerns about a new Edgware EV bus garage proposed in north London.

Neil added: ‘The problem is that millions of electric vehicles are due to be sold with lithium batteries.’

‘The way to prevent this is investment in new technologies to replace these highly flammable batteries.’

‘Right now toxic gases are highly dangerous to the health and safety of firefighters on the ground as well.’

‘These fires are virtually impossible to stop and until then we face an increase and likelihood of more.’

For a more in-depth look into lithium-ion battery fires, check out our complete overview on the topic HERE.